Question
Topic: Advertising/PR
Brand Awareness Or Direct Response First?
Related Discussions
- How Market A Band Debut Event
- What Is Ergonomic Furniture?
- Marketing Strategy
- Choosing A Suitable Advertising Caption
- Same Ad In 2 Different Languages
- Advertising Psychology Practice To Medical Doctors
- Identifying Co-op Dollars
- Google Advertising Quality Score Column
- I’m Struggling To Get Responses For Survey
- International Marketing Of Bulla Dairy Foods
- Search more Know-How Exchange Q&A
Community Info
Top 25 Experts
(Advertising/PR)
- Jay Hamilton-Roth 84,725 points
- mgoodman 67,219 points
- Gary Bloomer 32,504 points
- Peter (henna gaijin) 19,646 points
- Gail@PUBLISIDE 14,246 points
- darcy.moen 12,052 points
- telemoxie 11,791 points
- SteveByrneMarketing 11,582 points
- steven.alker 10,655 points
- Mushfique Manzoor 7,932 points
- Mike Steffes 7,829 points
- Chris Blackman 7,205 points
- Blaine Wilkerson 7,073 points
- SRyan ;] 6,570 points
- Deremiah *CPE 5,922 points
- Pepper Blue 5,368 points
- Frank Hurtte 4,093 points
I have seen arguments for both.
Brand awareness allows you to build trust, familiarity, and a touch point prior to asking for a sale and follows the traditional funnel/customer journey.
However, it can be more costly and require follow up.
Direct response allows you to sell or ask for an action right away. However if the customer doesn't know the brand or be in market, they will just ignore the ad without getting any value.
I am not sure which one is best.
In my situation, I am a musician that has tried both. Although direct response has gotten me leads, the costs are high on a new audience that has never heard my name or music.
In my case it makes sense to me to generate brand awareness first, but it's more costly and takes more time.
What is the best approach in general?