Question
Topic: Website Critique
Why Are People Reluctant To Pay For Advice?
Related Discussions
- Tips On How To Make The Website Customer Friend?
- "my Lesson In A Box" Website. Would You Buy?
- What Is The Best Website Design Company?
- Website For New Restaurant
- Difference Between Web Development And Web Design
- Critique My Digital Marketing Website
- Top 3 Or So Suggestions For This Website (first)?
- I Have A Business And I Designed A Website
- Backlinks And Marketing
- My Author Website
- Search more Know-How Exchange Q&A
Community Info
Top 25 Experts
(Website Critique)
- Jay Hamilton-Roth 33,410 points
- mgoodman 18,492 points
- Gary Bloomer 15,478 points
- Frank Hurtte 8,158 points
- darcy.moen 4,362 points
- jpoyer 3,913 points
- SteveByrneMarketing 3,494 points
- Chris Blackman 3,271 points
- Peter (henna gaijin) 3,213 points
- NatashaChernavska 3,080 points
- simpson.kayle 3,000 points
- Harry Hallman 2,775 points
- Pepper Blue 2,635 points
- Inbox_Interactive 2,603 points
- Carl Crawford 2,413 points
- Deremiah *CPE 2,323 points
- SRyan ;] 2,119 points
- peg 1,777 points
- babbsela 1,766 points
Nearly 6 years ago I started a business that uses people we call "Web Mystery Shoppers" to give feedback to clients on their websites. It is basically a blend of a critiquing service and usability testing. People loved the idea from the start, but we've found it very difficult to get companies to actually put down money to get this sort of feedback. I'm trying to figure out why, and would value the feedback of the many people who come here for free website feedback.
(Apparently one of the barriers is convincing people that there is greater value to having a large sample of independent testers matched to the site's target market give feedback than free advice from places like this. I think you can get lots of useful feedback from places like this -- I'm here after all! -- but it is not the same sort of feedback you'd get from a service like ours. Maybe I need to find a way to make the difference clearer?)
Big banks got the concept immediately, and happily pay tens of thousands of dollars for this kind of feedback. So I figured the reluctance of smaller companies and retailers was simply that they couldn't afford tens of thousands of dollars. So we developed a version that is much more automated, and only costs $1499 (or less when it is on sale, like now). For that they get 30 people like their target customers giving detailed, page-by-page feedback as they work through the site. A typical report is about 150 pages long, filled with detailed comments.
But it still isn't selling as well as I think it should be. Why don't companies set aside money for this sort of feedback? What do you think would convince your employers to do so? Do you see the value to having independent, non-technical testers give detailed feedback on your site? What would make it easier to convey the value?
Other thoughts? (If you want to get a clearer idea of what the service itself is, please have a look at our website: www.webmysteryshoppers.com.) Thanks.