Certainly the business environment we're experiencing supports the ability to raise prices. Yet many price increase announcements are poorly executed and set the stage for future price sensitivity and demands for price concessions.

The way to better manage pricing changes is to separate the value component from the cost component. But successful implementation requires integrity, discipline and fairness.

An improving economy creates a problem

Looking back at the forecasts for 2004, there's an almost tangible feeling of relief: for some companies, the widely predicted economic recovery is beginning to materialize. Along with the recovery, many firms are now trying to grow profits through price increases. One trade journal editor recently told me that they've had to stop printing price-increase announcements—they're receiving an average of 67 daily.

Yes, the current business environment supports the ability to raise prices. And that's where the challenge emerges: many of the price increase announcements are being poorly executed. The majority of announcements cite higher costs as the reason for increasing prices. The problem with this approach is that it sets the stage for future price sensitivity and demands for price concessions.

Across most industries, product and operating costs (e.g., raw materials, energy, and freight) are rapidly increasing. If companies are to achieve profit growth, they will need to recover these costs.

But while these cost increases have been sudden and dramatic, it's uncertain how long they will last. For example, the cost of a barrel of oil is in record territory, but this level will unlikely continue forever.

The problem with cost-based price announcements occurs when costs begin to go back down and customers want a "pay back." They argue that "you got me as costs ran up, so you must pay me back as costs moderate." Cost-based price increases also encourage customers to track cost components.

And most importantly, cost-based price increases confuse the value component of price with cost components, causing customers to lose track of what's really valuable.

Separate value from cost

Implementing a pricing policy that separates the value component from the cost component is a better way to manage pricing changes. This allows customers to see the cost component but purposely keeps costs separate from value delivery.

The process starts with understanding the economic impact you have on each customer's business (how you decrease customer's costs and increase customer's revenue and profit) and the competitive alternatives each customer has.

Subscribe today...it's free!

MarketingProfs provides thousands of marketing resources, entirely free!

Simply subscribe to our newsletter and get instant access to how-to articles, guides, webinars and more for nada, nothing, zip, zilch, on the house...delivered right to your inbox! MarketingProfs is the largest marketing community in the world, and we are here to help you be a better marketer.

Already a member? Sign in now.

Sign in with your preferred account, below.

Did you like this article?
Know someone who would enjoy it too? Share with your friends, free of charge, no sign up required! Simply share this link, and they will get instant access…
  • Copy Link

  • Email

  • Twitter

  • Facebook

  • Pinterest

  • Linkedin


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

George E. Cressman, Jr. is vice-president and senior fellow at Strategic Pricing Group (www.strategicpricinggroup.com). He can be reached at gcressman@strategicpricinggroup.com.